All roundups
ThoughtSpot

Alternatives

Best ThoughtSpot alternatives

ThoughtSpot answers a typed question over data that has already been modelled, and the modelling is the job. Somebody structures the data before anyone searches it, and Essentials caps you at 25 million rows for $25 a user a month billed annually. People look around when that preparation never finished, or when what they actually wanted was a dashboard rather than a search box. Here are nine alternatives, grouped by the job they suit.

How to read this

Flitch publishes this page and is one of the tools on it. Prices are the vendors’ own published figures, and every entry says what the tool costs you as well as what it is good at.

Prices checked

At a glance

ToolBest forEntry price
Power BICompanies already running Microsoft 365, Azure or Fabric.Free account, then $14/user/month paid yearly
TableauAnalysts who want the deepest visual exploration available.Creator $75/user/month, billed annually
LookerTeams who want every metric defined once and governed.No public pricing
FlitchTeams who want dashboards, reports, apps and workflows built from a description.Free tier, then $20/month
BasedashTeams buying AI dashboards at enterprise scale.$1,000/month floor, no smaller tier
SigmaFinance and operations people who work in spreadsheets.No public pricing
MetabaseTeams with an engineer who can run a container.Free self-hosted, or $90/month + $6/user
Looker StudioReporting on Google Ads, Analytics and Sheets with no budget.Free
HexData teams who work in notebooks.Free Community tier, then $36/editor/month

Enterprise BI

Power BI

Power BI

Free account, then $14/user/month paid yearly
Best for.
Companies already running Microsoft 365, Azure or Fabric.
Where it wins.
$14 per user per month paid yearly, the cheapest enterprise BI seat there is.
What it costs you.
Copilot is not in that price. It needs a Fabric capacity from $262.80 a month on top of seats, and Desktop is Windows only.
Read the full comparison

Tableau

Creator $75/user/month, billed annually
Best for.
Analysts who want the deepest visual exploration available.
Where it wins.
More control over how a chart looks and behaves than anything else here.
What it costs you.
$75 per creator per month billed annually, and it expects someone whose job is building views.
Read the full comparison

Looker

No public pricing
Best for.
Teams who want every metric defined once and governed.
Where it wins.
LookML puts definitions in version control, so a number means the same thing in every report.
What it costs you.
No public pricing, and LookML is an engineering job to write and then keep current.
Read the full comparison

Looker Studio

Free
Best for.
Reporting on Google Ads, Analytics and Sheets with no budget.
Where it wins.
Free, with Google sources connected in a couple of clicks.
What it costs you.
Thin modelling, and it slows badly once the data is large or needs joining.

Built around AI

Flitch

Flitch

Free tier, then $20/month
Best for.
Teams who want dashboards, reports, apps and workflows built from a description.
Where it wins.
AI on every plan including the free one, and every chart shows the dataset, columns and calculation behind it.
What it costs you.
SCIM and running it in your own cloud need an Enterprise agreement, and it does not build an app with its own auth and payments.
Basedash

Basedash

$1,000/month floor, no smaller tier
Best for.
Teams buying AI dashboards at enterprise scale.
Where it wins.
SSO, SCIM and audit logs on the lowest tier, and it self-hosts.
What it costs you.
$1,000 a month floor, with nothing below it.
Read the full comparison

Spreadsheet-style

Sigma

Sigma

No public pricing
Best for.
Finance and operations people who work in spreadsheets.
Where it wins.
A spreadsheet over the warehouse, and it writes back.
What it costs you.
No public pricing, and you need a cloud warehouse before you start.
Read the full comparison

Open source and developer-first

Metabase

Free self-hosted, or $90/month + $6/user
Best for.
Teams with an engineer who can run a container.
Where it wins.
Free under AGPL v3 for unlimited users if you self-host. That is a genuine advantage.
What it costs you.
Someone deploys it, upgrades it and keeps it up, and AI sits on the paid tiers.
Read the full comparison
Hex

Hex

Free Community tier, then $36/editor/month
Best for.
Data teams who work in notebooks.
Where it wins.
Python, SQL and no-code cells in one document.
What it costs you.
$36 per editor per month after the free tier, and it is built for analysts rather than for the people reading the output.
Read the full comparison

When to stay with ThoughtSpot

  • The data is already modelled and people are asking questions of it.
  • You want many non-technical people typing questions rather than opening dashboards.
  • You need 250 million rows in one place, which Pro covers.
  • You came from Mode and want the nearest continuation of it.

Questions

What is the cheapest ThoughtSpot alternative?

Looker Studio and Apache Superset are free, and Metabase is free for unlimited users if you self-host. Among hosted tools with AI on the entry plan, Flitch starts at $20 a user a month with a free tier under it.

Which alternatives answer questions the way Spotter does?

Flitch answers questions on a published dashboard and builds the dashboard from a description. Power BI has Copilot, which needs a Fabric capacity from $262.80 a month. Metabase and Sigma put AI on their paid tiers.

Do I have to model the data first?

For ThoughtSpot, yes: search resolves against a prepared model. Flitch connects to raw sources and takes relationships as you go, and Metabase reads a database as it finds it. The modelling becomes optional rather than the first project.

What happened to Mode?

ThoughtSpot bought it and folded it into Analyst Studio. If the notebook was the part you liked, Hex is the closer match at $36 an editor a month.

Are the row limits a real constraint?

They are on ThoughtSpot: 25 million rows on Essentials and 250 million on Pro. Tools that aggregate in SQL at the source, Flitch and Sigma among them, leave the rows where they are and price on people instead.